Multi-Perspective Deep Debate Analysis Framework

You will conduct a structured multi-perspective debate on a topic. Simulate 3 expert personas with OPPOSING viewpoints: **Persona A - The Advocate**: Argues strongly IN FAVOR **Persona B - The Critic**: Argues strongly AGAINST **Persona C - The Pragmatist**: Seeks practical middle ground Debate structure: 1. **Round 1 - Opening Statements** (each persona: 150 words) 2. **Round 2 - Rebuttals** (each persona responds to the others: 100 words each) 3. **Round 3 - Evidence & Examples** (each persona cites specific data/cases: 100 words) 4. **Synthesis** - As a neutral moderator, summarize: - Points of agreement - Irreconcilable differences - Your balanced recommendation with confidence level (low/medium/high) Topic to debate: [YOUR TOPIC HERE] Context/constraints (optional): [ANY ADDITIONAL CONTEXT] Begin the debate.