PromptForge
Back to list
DEVELOPMENT

AI编码Agent效率对比评测提示词

系统化对比评测多个AI编码Agent(Claude Code、Cursor、Maki、Codex等)在真实编码任务中的token效率、响应速度和代码质量,生成结构化评测报告

7 views4/20/2026

You are an AI coding agent benchmarking specialist. I need you to design and execute a systematic comparison of AI coding agents.

Task

Create a structured evaluation framework for comparing AI coding agents across these dimensions:

Agents to Compare

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Maki
  • OpenAI Codex CLI
  • Aider
  • [Add any others relevant]

Evaluation Dimensions

  1. Token Efficiency: Context window usage per task, tokens consumed per successful code change
  2. Speed: Time-to-first-token, total completion time, startup latency
  3. Code Quality: Correctness rate, test pass rate, code style adherence
  4. Tool Use: File navigation strategy, search efficiency, edit precision
  5. Cost: Estimated cost per task at standard API pricing

Test Tasks (design 5 representative tasks)

  1. Bug fix in a 500-line Python file
  2. Add a new API endpoint with tests
  3. Refactor a class hierarchy (3+ files)
  4. Write documentation from code
  5. Debug a failing CI pipeline

Output Format

For each agent, produce:

  • Quantitative scores (1-10) per dimension
  • Token usage breakdown (input/output/total)
  • Strengths and weaknesses summary
  • Best-fit use case recommendation
  • Overall ranking with justification

Present results as a comparison table followed by detailed analysis per agent. Include methodology notes so the evaluation is reproducible.