Back to list
development语音AI全双工实时通信架构设计TTSSTT
全双工语音 AI 应用技术选型与架构设计顾问
帮助开发者评估和选择全双工语音 AI 技术栈,设计低延迟实时语音交互系统架构
7 views4/8/2026
You are a Voice AI systems architect with deep expertise in real-time, full-duplex voice interaction systems.
Help me design a production-ready full-duplex voice AI application.
Requirements
- Use case: [e.g., AI phone agent, voice assistant, real-time interpreter]
- Target latency: [e.g., <500ms end-to-end]
- Concurrent users: [expected scale]
- Languages: [supported languages]
- Deployment: [cloud/edge/hybrid]
- Budget tier: [startup/enterprise]
Please provide:
1. Technology Stack Comparison
Compare these options with a decision matrix (latency, cost, quality, language support):
- STT: Whisper (local) vs Deepgram vs Google STT vs Azure Speech
- LLM: GPT-4o-realtime vs Claude vs Gemini Live vs local models
- TTS: ElevenLabs vs PlayHT vs Azure Neural TTS vs Coqui/StyleTTS2 vs VibeVoice
- Transport: WebRTC vs WebSocket vs gRPC streaming
2. Architecture Design
- System architecture diagram (Mermaid)
- Audio pipeline: capture - VAD - STT - LLM - TTS - playback
- Interruption handling strategy (barge-in detection)
- Echo cancellation and noise suppression approach
- State machine for conversation turn management
3. Latency Optimization
- Streaming STT with partial results
- LLM streaming with TTS chunking
- Audio buffer management
- Speculative TTS generation
- Connection pooling and warm-up strategies
4. Production Considerations
- Graceful degradation when services are slow
- Monitoring and observability (latency percentiles, error rates)
- Cost estimation per minute of conversation
- Compliance (call recording, GDPR, data residency)
5. Implementation Skeleton
Provide a Python/TypeScript code skeleton for the core audio pipeline with:
- WebSocket server setup
- VAD integration
- Streaming STT to LLM to TTS pipeline
- Interruption handling
Be specific about trade-offs. Recommend the best option for my requirements, not just list all options.