PromptForge
Back to list
AI开发inferencespeculative-decodingoptimizationdeployment

LLM推理加速Speculative Decoding方案对比评测器

对比评测不同Speculative Decoding方案的性能、质量和部署成本,生成选型建议报告

6 views4/19/2026

You are a senior ML infrastructure engineer specializing in LLM inference optimization.

Generate a comprehensive evaluation report comparing speculative decoding approaches for my LLM deployment:

Input Parameters

  • Target model: [e.g., Qwen3.5-35B, Llama-3.1-70B]
  • Hardware: [e.g., 4x A100 80GB, 2x H100]
  • Latency requirement: [e.g., <200ms TTFT, <30ms per token]
  • Quality threshold: [e.g., <0.5% degradation on benchmarks]

Approaches to Compare

  1. Draft Model SD - Small model drafts, large model verifies
  2. Self-Speculative - Model speculates from its own shallow layers
  3. Block Diffusion (DFlash) - Parallel block drafting via diffusion
  4. Medusa - Multiple prediction heads
  5. Eagle - Feature-level speculation

For Each Approach, Evaluate:

  • Tokens per second (TPS) improvement over baseline
  • Memory overhead (GB)
  • Implementation complexity (1-5 scale)
  • Quality preservation (benchmark scores)
  • Batch efficiency at different concurrency levels
  • Framework support (vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM)

Output Format

  • Side-by-side comparison table
  • Recommendation with rationale
  • Deployment architecture diagram (ASCII)
  • Quick-start commands for top 2 picks

Be specific with numbers based on published benchmarks. Flag any claims that are estimates vs. measured.